NEET Exam Analysis 2025 – The NEET 2025 exam has sprung a big surprise. The reason being the difficulty level of NEET 2025 was through the roof!
Candidates were seen crying outside NEET 2025 exam centers.
Many candidates who were appearing in the exam the 2nd or 3rd time expecting to get a better score saw their efforts go down the drain as they can foresee a much lower score than in their previous attempts.
Even first time test takers were left shell shocked. Some candidates, for instance, were expecting 650+ scores, but now say they are struggling to hit 400.
The NEET 2025 question paper has therefore sent shockwaves among the student community and there is now a lot of anxiety as to what could be the NEET 2025 cut-off.
Here we discuss all these and much more. So, keep reading NEET exam analysis 2025.
NEET 2025 exam analysis by leading agencies
| Agency | NEET 2025 Exam Analysis |
| Indian Express | Read Here |
| Allen | Read Here |
| PW Live | Read Here |
| Aakash | Read Here |
| CollegeDekho | Read Here |
| Career Point Kota | Read Here |
| Om Educare Services | Expected 15% AIQ & Qualifying Cut-Off |
| NEET Kaka JEE | NEET 2025 Expected Cut Off |
Also Read:
- Best Books to prepare for NEET 2025 – Physics, Chemistry, Biology
- NEET Exam Pattern 2025 (Revised to pre-COVID format) – Section-wise Questions, OMR-Sheet, Marking Scheme, Mode
- NEET Syllabus 2025 (OUT)- No Changes Made, Download Subject-wise Syllabus
NEET Exam Analysis 2025 – Expected Cut-off
| NEET Cut Off 2025 (Expected) | ||
| Category | Qualifying Percentile | Expected NEET 2025 Cut-Off Marks |
| General | 50th Percentile | 720 to 155 |
| General-PH | 45th Percentile | 154 to 135 |
| SC | 40th Percentile | 154 to 125 |
| OBC | 40th Percentile | 154 to 125 |
| ST | 40th Percentile | 154 to 125 |
| SC/OBC-PH | 40th Percentile | 135 to 125 |
| ST-PH | 40th Percentile | 135 to 125 |
NEET Exam Analysis 2025 – Key Takeaways
Chemistry
- The Chemistry section was quite lengthy, requiring meticulous attention to detail. Experts noted that even small misinterpretations could lead to mistakes, emphasizing that while the theoretical portions were relatively straightforward, the application-based questions significantly increased the difficulty level.
- Most questions were drawn from the Class 12 syllabus, demanding clear conceptual understanding and analytical skills.
- The section included numerous statement-based and matrix-match questions, along with one assertion-reason question. Notably, several problems required the integration of multiple concepts at once, making them more time-consuming compared to the previous year’s exam.
NEET Chemistry 2025 exam analysis
| Topic | Number of Questions |
| Physical Chemistry | 16 |
| Inorganic Chemistry | 12 |
| Organic Chemistry | 17 |
Biology
- The Biology section (Botany and Zoology), while not overly complex conceptually, was notably lengthy. The questions demanded thorough reading and attention to detail. Questions were based on NCERT syllabus, and the problems were framed conceptually, with subtle phrasing designed to test deeper understanding rather than simple memorization.
- Most questions followed a familiar pattern, though a few posed a challenge. Some questions were derived from introductory passages, chapter-end exercises, and even brief scientist profiles featured at the beginning of certain chapters.
- According to experts, more questions were asked from Class 12 syllabus compared to Class 11, offering a balanced combination of factual, conceptual, and analytical questions.
Physics
According to most students and also experts, Physics was the most difficult of the three sections. Unless the candidate had a deep conceptual grasp and strong analytical skills, it was very difficult to attempt questions in the section.
Many questions though formula-driven, yet multi-layered, requiring significant time investment. Students found it particularly tough as they had to integrate concepts from different chapters to solve problems, further elevating the difficulty level.
Most test-takers struggled with time management, especially when tackling complex problems from Modern Physics, Electrodynamics, and Thermodynamics.
The section was exceptionally rigorous, with a heavier emphasis on Class 11 topics and calculation-intensive problems.
Interestingly, the section included very few, if any, statement-based, assertion-reason, or match-the-column type questions.
Mechanics-based questions were mostly asked.